Over the past 2 days, I’ve read a couple of articles discussing the “paleo” diet and it’s application to people. There are those on one side of the fence that insist on an elimination of many foods that have been shown to cause unwanted responses in people. The other side of the fence are people that claim that the “paleo” diet is a fad and that the “caveman” idea has been debunked because neanderthals have been found with fossilized remains of cooked plants and legumes in their teeth.
I find myself in the middle. The elimination of grains and much sugar has done wonders for my family. It has almost cured my sister’s lupus condition and dropped pounds from just about everyone. It has given us all more energy and helped us to become more fit. However, I find that it probably would have never come to be without taking the necessary steps. If you tell someone to simply eat “meats, nuts and seeds, veggies, fruit and blah blah blah”, I don’t think it will work. The idea should be to ease into the lifestyle. Just as a coach shouldn’t have their brand new client do Fran with “Rx” weight, I don’t think a total immersion in the lifestyle will work from the get go. Steps are necessary because the effect will be such that the person either buys totally into the program, or becomes discouraged by the difficulty. For these reasons, I enjoy Dr. Harris’ 12 step program, it’s a good start for many people. I myself would begin with the elimination of grains, then move on to sugar, but only because I’ve found that it becomes easier that way.

In taking steps, I don’t see a problem with the consumption of “paleo-ish” foods. Again, I find this to be beneficial further down the road. It took me about 1-2 years to become almost totally primal. I started first by eliminating bread and other grains. Then moved on from there, until I was finally able to break from artificial sweeteners. The same most likely goes for others. I think my sister has seen great benefit and she still consumes “paleo” pizza from time to time as well as almond flour breaded meats. It is these meals that have helped to keep her on track with the lifestyle. While I don’t believe that food consumption based solely on these meals will be of great benefit, I do believe that the elimination of grains/gluten and some sugars will provide HUGE benefit. So my response is, the 80/20 principle is a good start for everyone. Others will see amazing benefit from going strict, but seems a better idea to gradually bring them on board in fear that the proscribed dose will be too much to handle for some. Plus, doesn’t that pizza just look too good to not try it?
Training begins with laying the foundation

